And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities.
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Conversation
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Replying to
Don’t be so dramatic. You claiming you need a gun to protect yourself against the government is ludicrous. But you seem like a reasonable person. If an assault weapons ban happens, I’m sure you’ll follow law.
If you think the US Army is going to attack its fellow citizens because nimrods like you tell them to, you are in for a rude awakening, simpleton.
7
15
102
Not as ludicrous as a Congressman threatening to nuke his own country.
2
8
85
You are the one who brought up nukes, sir.
The world is dotted with mass graves filled with people who didn't think they needed personal protection against their government.
1
10
38
Uh, duh. There’s historical precedent for this very reason. Either you are ignorant of the constitution and/or through that ignorance want to foster tyranny in this country. History has shown how disarming the population plays out. Full disclosure: I am a former Liberal Democrat.
4
12
21
It’s amazing to me that the United States has representatives that are so ignorant. The 2d amendment was created so we can protect ourselves from our own government. That’s fact not drama. You’re not taking our guns. Ever! #Freedom
29
90
187
"Don't be so dramatic" ...
... said the politician who recently suggested indiscriminate nuclear slaughter of US citizens would be a valid policy-option in response to any intransigence over firearms confiscation.
2
3
23
By the way there is no such thing as an assault rifle. Assault is a verb not a noun. How about we have some education about guns. You want to stop some violence let’s go back to educating kids about guns and how to use them and gun safety like we do here in MT.
4
1
10
