Notice how, to these "parental rights" antivaxers, it's all about THEM: THEIR rights. THEIR religion. THEIR freedom. The child's right not to be medically neglected, not to be left unnecessarily vulnerable to disease, never even enters the equation. It doesn't occur to them.https://twitter.com/RepStickland/status/1125849017282433024 …
-
-
Now you're reduced to calling me a Commie? What year is this? 1955?



-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Please provide your source for that ignorant statement? Source?
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
He knows exactly what he’s speaking about — you obviously have a computer ... now go research how the (Measles Mumps Rubella) MMR vaccine sheds and that unvaccinated children do not pose any risk to your children. Acquiring wild measles: research that too. Do Your Research.
End of conversation
-
-
-
What? We are discussing facts. Your insults are very demeaning to you. Do you want to discuss facts or not?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Personal responsibility would include willingness to face consequences for your choices, when they harm others. As to parental rights, why do they include the right to infect other people's children with disease?pic.twitter.com/zz3KpNhrrI
-
Indeed. As a matter of "personal responsibility," does
@RepStickland support changing Texas law to make it possible for parents of a child who catches an infectious disease from an unvaccinated child to sue that child's parents? Personal responsibility implies consequences.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.