Yeah, transparency would be great. Like, you could have told us you'd received campaign money from some very shady Russians. Republicans are there in the room for all the committee meetings. Your turn will come.
-
-
-
I propose The Smucker Policy. When a politician takes shady money and gets caught and promises to "give it back" the money is given to those running against them
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There is no requirement to hold a vote to initiate the inquiry. This is all you have. It's a deflection. If and when the House do take the vote, you'll make up some other ridiculous requirement not required in any legal precedent. Have fun being dragged down by a criminal!
-
I guess they are done trying to argue that he didn't do anything wrong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
SCHIFF, PELOSI, SCHUMER= Treason! Sedition! Corruption! Vs. TRUMP, SMUCKER, SCALISE= Truth, Justice and The American Way !
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I feel like half of Congress doesn't know what impeachment is. You know the house does one thing then the Senate does a different thing, right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's not a trial, it's an inquiry, the trial part of impeachmemt happens in the senate. You should start studying how this process works.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Now do the GOP behind closed doors tax bill.














New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
BREAKING → I just asked the Democrat Majority a simple yes or no question: Has the House been authorized to conduct an impeachment inquiry into