Historically speaking the citing "religious freedom" was used to justify opposing the Civil Rights Act too. The first amendment is not an amendment to souly protect religious beliefs it is an amendment to protect those of all beliefs secular or otherwise. E.A. ensures that.
Today, I took to the Floor of the U.S. House of Representatives to voice my opposition to the so-called #HR5, the "#EqualityAct":https://youtu.be/xMssyIHt_f8
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can you explain your motivations for this? Would like to better understand, from your perspective, how this impacts our district specifically.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank you!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But in the meantime the government can force its " rigid and unyielding fist" into my body.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank you, sir. Right on!
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Christian Taliban at it again.
-
Oh yea, you should have heard them talking about Moses... How do you compare the Constitution to the Bible. These evvangelicals will get people killed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Your bigotry is showing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.