76017 voter. Here’s a question for you...if Trump is innocent, why is he blocking some many of his exculpatory witnesses from testifying?
-
-
-
He does not have to exonerate himself. He does not ever have to testify even if there was more than gossip for him to refute. In any case, so far there are no facts for him to refute. It’s *all* been hearsay, gossip, supposition, and angry ramblings.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
76006 voter. Let’s have a town hall to discuss this so-called “waste of time.” Meanwhile, you keep pushing “telebortion” and “K9” bills that do nothing but stoke a small section of your electorate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's what WE taxpayer's keep asking!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They weren’t fact witnesses, sir. You should know this. Using
@RepMattGaetz as an example of legal precision doesn’t reflect well on you. Focus your energy on understanding why our leader is seeking favors from foreign powers in violation of his oath. Didn’t sign up for autocracy -
“They weren’t fact witnesses” We noticed. As such they are a useless waste of time & energy. An exercise in gossip mongering. A whisper chain of angry non facts. A public display of psychological and emotional sharing best done on a psychiatrist’s couch not from a witness box.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Asking if anyone had any knowledge of facts rather than impressions, feelings, suppositions, or hearsay three times removed. That’s what you think is a stupid question....

End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.