Raul M. GrijalvaVerified account

RT @RepRaulGrijalva: #Keystone SEIS fix in long ago. Utter sham from State Dept Conflicts of interest ignored http://1.usa.gov/LiPnEL  #NoKXL

RT @RepRaulGrijalva: #Keystone SEIS fix in long ago. Utter sham from State Dept Conflicts of interest ignored http://1.usa.gov/LiPnEL  #NoKXL

@RepRaulGrijalva @AlanGrayson How do you outsource important study to bankers of world oil in the "City of London" - are we still a colony?

@RepRaulGrijalva might be Arizona's top contribution to national policy discussions. An insightful voice that will gain in importance.

@RepRaulGrijalva My understanding is that SEIS clearly states the pipeline does not present or represent a significant environmental risk.

@RepRaulGrijalva Pipelines are generally not significant environmental risks, nasty, tar sand oil is a significant producer of pollution.

@RepRaulGrijalva Stating pipelines are not a problem is similar to saying the paper in cigarettes does not cause cancer. Does smoking?

@RepRaulGrijalva IF SEIS states the pipeline does not represent a significant threat to the environment, then just eliminate oil in it.

@RepRaulGrijalva your an idiot. You show it at every hearing you attend