I’m watching on CSPAN. As one of your constituents, who uses mail-in ballots and lives miles from the nearest post box...THANK YOU!! It’s easier and closer for me to drop it at a polling place, plus I need my sticker saying, “I voted”. 
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-


thank you!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Limiting freedom of association by forcing the American people to subsidize campaigns they don’t support, while also requiring local communities to lean more on the Federal Government, is not the way to improve our nation’s democracy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Some of us like to wait. Why is none of your business.
End of conversation
-
-
-
It’s all about the Benjamins... Guaranteeing federal matching contributions for public campaigns inherently suppresses the average voter, who is financially unable or chooses not to donate to campaigns.pic.twitter.com/QlQrEo5z03
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
H.R.1 is the establishment of a new publicly financed, campaign contribution matching system. Through this new mechanism, candidates running for either President or the U.S. House of Reps would be “entitled” to a 600% match of the amount raised through donations of $200 or lesspic.twitter.com/Jw7tIOV6U2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Further, by using taxpayer dollars to match campaign donations, tax-paying Americans would also have their right to free association restricted. Individual taxpayers would be effectively forced to support candidates with whom they may disagree.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
H.R.1 would allow taxpayer dollars to pay for child care, elder care, premiums, copayments, and deductibles to “enable the participation of the candidate or staff.” Essentially, taxpayers would be responsible for funding an entire campaign’s staff benefitshttps://arizonadailyindependent.com/2019/03/04/grijalva-staffer-misses-court-hearing-for-maga-hat-assault-charges/?fbclid=IwAR0yTSOguP6WmH_wOr6kUJgxyJqRRSb0ttFEidUXO2GuR5m_-Qocpm2kUPk …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.