John RatcliffeOvjeren akaunt

@RepRatcliffe

U.S. Congressman for Texas' 4th District. Member of House Intelligence Committee, & House Ethics. Former federal prosecutor.

Heath, TX
Vrijeme pridruživanja: listopad 2014.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @RepRatcliffe

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @RepRatcliffe

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    The 2020 Washington Democrat party explained, in one video: “I don't care what kind of nice, little, legal, Constitutional defenses that they came up with”

    Poništi
  2. Responding to defamatory attacks with humor and grace is just one reason why Tim Scott is one of the most inspiring and admired people in politics today

    Poništi
  3. We warned them...As Schiff and House Democrats argue today for more witnesses and evidence, let’s remind everyone what we told them about the need for more witnesses and evidence the day Schiff rushed a vote on his “overwhelming” articles of impeachment.

    Poništi
  4. His latest Trump frame job falling apart, Schiff tells Senators yesterday this impeachment is a clear case of “bribery.” He just neglected to mention why “bribery” got destroyed and then ditched over in the House.

    Poništi
  5. Another huge win delivered by President Trump today with the signing of the USMCA. Looking forward to seeing the positive impact on our economy.

    Poništi
  6. Alan Dershowitz made it clear: even if you assume everything supposedly in the Bolton book manuscript is true, “abuse of power” and “obstruction of Congress” both fail as legal, constitutional arguments. They’re not impeachable offenses.

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    "This is why you do fulsome investigations over in the House before you dump this on the doorstep of the United States Senate. The Senate can’t fix this. This is a process that was broken and corrupted all the way along." -

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Q: What would happen with the ongoing prosecutions of fentanyl analogue traffickers if the ban expires next week? A: There would be potentially a whole host of issues. : I was afraid that was going to be your answer, and I think it just underscores the urgency.

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    "The Democrats keep saying, 'Our case is overwhelming, the evidence is indisputable. Now over in the Senate they’re saying, “But we need more evidence.'" - The truth? Democrats have failed to make their case ↓

    Poništi
  10. Contrary to Democrats' “it’s debunked” assertion, Ambassador Yovanovitch admitted the Hunter Biden-Burisma pay-to-play board position was so concerning to the Obama administration that Burisma was the only Ukrainian company she was briefed on for her Senate confirmation.

    Poništi
  11. Read the July 25 call transcript. The pause on Ukrainian aid was because of President Trump’s longstanding concern with burden sharing by other countries. Even still, Ukraine received the aid, received it early and did nothing in return to get it.

    Poništi
  12. The President’s defense is effectively unwinding how Democrats misrepresented the testimony of witnesses like Tim Morrison, who while listening in during the Trump-Zelensky call, heard no “demands”, no bribery, no extortion and nothing improper.

    Poništi
  13. Every time things don’t go the Democrats’ way, they try to change the narrative and selectively leak information. No witness testimony can change the fact that this president was deprived of due process.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. sij

    ., , and speak with the press during a break in the impeachment trial. 📸 by 

    Poništi
  15. But in his public testimony, Ambassador Sondland used the words “assume, presume, guess, speculate and belief” over 30 times. When Trump’s defense team presents our core arguments tomorrow, this is the type of misrepresentation we’re going to tear apart.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. During the first three days of the Senate impeachment trial, Democrats told the American people that their star witness, Ambassador Sondland, unequivocally confirmed under oath that there was quid pro quo.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. About to join on to discuss the defense arguments in the Senate impeachment trial.

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    25. sij

    By giving up much of the first day, the White House gave a concise opening, relieved the jury, and pushed the main argument to Monday with a larger television audience. It was a sophisticated and effective strategy that paid off. A very strong start to their case .

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  20. Looking forward to joining on tomorrow at about 10:20 a.m. ET to discuss today’s defense arguments in the Senate impeachment trial.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·