Ladies be shopping!
I sit on the House Appropriations Committee and for the record, we did not authorize $31,000 of taxpayer money for Secretary Carson (or his wife) to spend on a dining room set. We need a better answer for how he allowed this to happen in his department.https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/976188644695461888 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He's blaming his wife. Happy wife, happy life.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Since you didn't approve the money for Sec. Carson's furniture, could you approve about $7,500 for a clothing allowance? I have like 8 interviews lined up over the next 4 days and I'm running out of suits!
#InCaseYouDidNotKnowIAmFamousThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Right, so, when (if) you get that better answer, what will you do with it? My prediction is that nothing will be done. This doesn't seem to matter much in the grand scheme of other current things. ie: Betsy Devos, Puerto Rico, NRA, ACA, etc., etc., et all.
#toomuchcrazyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Carson didn't only allow it , he did it and probably more you haven't found out about yet, so investigate the spending records of his HUD office & family he has employed n HUD since he became n charge, you might find a lot more outrageous things happening there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Suddenly you're a fiscal conservative? You're right on this one but, stay consistent.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.