McConnell set the rule. Now, he and Senate Republicans need to follow it. No vote on a Supreme Court nominee until after the new Congress is seated.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
#Spanky shouldn’t be allowed to fill the position. There is a possibility that he won’t finish his term. Republican logic. Example - Obama.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Need to wait until after the mid-terms, Paul. Just sayin...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And then we're all screwed
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about a Justice that cares more about human rights and our democracy and less about corporations and discriminatory regulations? Just sayin...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You have 6 months. Start packing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can't wait to regress to the days of botched back alley abortions and increased deaths. Yeah for "pro-life".
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Not until after the November elections and winners have taken office.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m sure you have plenty of advice for the Orange Menace regarding how to PICK thingspic.twitter.com/yCLw3jODFy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We have a President who is under investigation for conspiring with Russia over his own election. If guilty, we are allowing Putin to pick our Supreme Court justices. We should let the investigation run its course first.
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.