Important read from @Heritage. Efforts to defund NSA "unwise and possibly unconstitutional" http://herit.ag/13C0L4N
-
.
@RepMikeRogers@Heritage What's so supppeerrrrr constitutional about government spying without warrant? 4th amendment is pretty clear.
@JulieBorowski SCOTUS ruled no expectation of privacy on phone records. Preserving records =/= spying. NSA uses legal tool to stop attacks.
-
-
.
@RepMikeRogers Thanks for your response. But the federal gov collecting phone records of U.S. citizens is the opposite of limited gov. -
@JulieBorowski appreciate the thoughtful dialogue. -
.
@RepMikeRogers While we seem to have different understandings of the 4th amendment, I do appreciate you responding to me. Thanks. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
.
@RepMikeRogers SCOTUS is often wrong. You think it is permissible for fed govt to collect phone records of innocent U.S. citizens? -
@JulieBorowski When authorized by a court order (issued by 11 Senate confirmed judges), & accessed only 2 disrupt foreign terror plots? Yes. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@RepMikeRogers@JulieBorowski if no expectation of privacy on phone records, can you give us your phone records please? thanks. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@RepMikeRogers@JulieBorowski Then I challenge you to post all your personal and government phone records online for the last 6 months.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@RepMikeRogers so Mike were do you stand on the NSA gathering Americans info?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@RepMikeRogers SCOTUS also ruled Obamacare constitutional but that didn't stop you from introducing bills to limit it. Restore the 4th!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@RepMikeRogers@onekade@JulieBorowski: But thanks for supporting big government, we wouldn't have it without you.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@RepMikeRogers@JulieBorowski Would this be the same SCOTUS that once said separate but equal was legal? (Hint: it isn't)#Legal<>RightThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@RepMikeRogers@onekade@JulieBorowski so ars you sponsoring legislation making phone data private? If not, why? -
@RepMikeRogers@onekade@JulieBorowski Explain why these broad, wide ranging, secret warrants are needed to obtain info that's not private
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@RepMikeRogers@JulieBorowski Congressman, does SCOTUS have an expectation of privacy in their telephone calls? Does the press? NAACP? Eff?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@RepMikeRogers@JulieBorowski Representative, could you please provide us the meta data for all of your personal and congressional calls?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@RepMikeRogers When did you know they were collecting our emails? Why did you deny it? http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/16174-who-lied-mike-rogers-the-nsa-and-xkeyscore …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@RepMikeRogers@JulieBorowski When Rep. Rogers publishes all his phone records, then I'll believe the "no expectation of privacy" line.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.