The analogy makes no sense. The difference is that normal jurors don't have a say in the trial process. Here, the so called jurors get to set the process. And the craven Republican majority have chosen to protect the President over the oaths they took to be impartial. Pathetic.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you have even one independent thought, Dan?pic.twitter.com/57uMgNDmrv
-
No, he’s a
#GOParrot
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The Republicans don't want to hear from the old witnesses either so there is that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We need witnesses & documents. Period. Let's hear from John Bolton.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s not at all what it would be like but nice try.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trump, who obstructed Congress by withholding documents and witnesses, just told reporters in Davos that the House doesn’t have the evidence, “we” have all the evidence. Given that one of the charges is obstruction, that’s as brazenly corrupt and cynical as it gets.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There's this, straight from the horses (ahem) mouth:pic.twitter.com/GoaNQdIfe9
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I want to hear all the evidence before a decision is made. I believe in finding out the truth. I’m sorry you don’t.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.