Nice stunt, dude. There’s zero chance this happens and if it does, they’ll be sued out of existence instantly and you’ll lose your platform altogether. Come up with a less transparent way to work the ref.
If you are going to opine as to the truth or falsity of that which is put on your platform for the sake of its viewers, you should not get the protections of Section 230.
You are not a platform, you are editorializing.
#TwitterFactCheck
-
-
-
Funny how the conservatives are all publicly going to the mat for Trump to be able to continue to lie on twitter. They're not even contesting facts, they're contesting the existence of facts.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You know who hates smuggling laws? Smugglers. You know who hates shoplifting laws? Shoplifters. You know who hates fact checking? Liars.
-
Perfect.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
fact-checking is not censorship. meanwhile, 100,000 Americans are dead.pic.twitter.com/g0ft7Tw4Xt
-
Maybe not in that example but when fact checking cites unreliable sources, it's not fact checking. Also, it's the CCPs fault.
#chinaviras Fact
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
#MattGaetzIsATool Pass it on. -
#MattGaetzIsATool still, and always
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
i'll drink and drive to that!pic.twitter.com/6u4XzUjB3t
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.