There was no policy disagreement: the funding was set by Congress and every agency in the government concluded Trump had to send it. However, using an unaccountable back-channel to force a foreign country to investigate a domestic political opponent is an abuse of power.
This is a policy disagreement, not an abuse of power.pic.twitter.com/5nTYuerBhY
Policy Disagreement
You'll see individuals testifying this week fit into the category of people who had a substantive policy disagreement with the administration.
-
-
-
Misinformation and speculation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I elected
@realDonaldTrump ! Not these people. I’ve never heard of these people but they’ve decided that the President’s foreign policy is not what THEY WANT! The tail wagging the dog?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We elected to president not these bureaucrats that they think they have power over the American people
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not at all....they trying very hard to take us the public for fools
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please make this the united Republican stance.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And he knew the thoughts in the President's mind, wow, that's impressive.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
It's like,how dare President Trump question aid or policies to any country..
-
Except he didn't question the aid, he held it up in order to coerce a foreign government into investigating a political opponent
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.