Driving a car is a perfectly lawful act. Driving a car into a crowd of people is not. Similarly, a president firing an ambassador is fine. A president firing an ambassador because she was an obstacle to his extortion scheme is not.
This statement inadvertently gives you an inside look at how unserious and utterly baseless the Democrats' impeachment case against @realDonaldTrump is. They think it's an "abuse of power" to remove someone who explicitly serves at the pleasure of the President.https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1192305929686880256 …
0:45
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Representative Swallell knows full well that a President needs to have ambassadors in place that support the President’s policies. To claim that the President must keep in place an ambassador that does not support his policies ...that is Congressman Swallell abusing his power.
-
You say policy. The constitution says extortion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Depends what they were removed for. Trump’s reason = extortion. Not only was the ambassador removed, she was also ridiculed and demeaned with cruel lies from trump and his thugs.
-
Aaand she was told that if she tweeted nice things about Trump the whole thing would go away. It would be highly inappropriate for a US Ambassador to do such a thing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Great. A lecture in law. On the one hand, we have Mark Meadows, who earned an Associates in Arts (Wiki says he pretended it was Bachelor’s). On the other,
@RepSwalwell with a degree in law (JD). Here is one hoot Mr. Meadows, None of us gives two.#ImpeachAndRemoveTrump - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
North Carolina deserves better than you.
-
Yes we do!!!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.