This is SO intellectually dishonest, Lee. Sonldand's revision today completely invalidates this statement.
I asked Volker: And in no way, shape, or form in either the readouts from the United States or Ukraine did you receive any indication whatsoever for anything that resembles a quid pro quo? Volker: Correctpic.twitter.com/vdmJnSWPyo
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Right, because the quid pro quo was outside the readouts.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Adam Schiff's retracted version coming up soon:pic.twitter.com/Znv8S3s2NC
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In new 4-page sworn statement, Amb. Sondland says he now remembers telling a top Zelenskiy aide that Ukraine wouldn’t get its military assistance until it committed to investigations, according to a person with knowledge of his testimony
-
And he also says in the same 4 page sworn statement that he was presuming the arrangement and still, to this day does not know why the aid was technically held up. So congrats on nailing Sondland for something.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.