I appreciate the questions you've asked in response to this video. I've answered many of them on my Facebook page here:https://www.facebook.com/CongressmanKevinYoder/videos/1689336574452582/ …
-
-
Show this thread
-
If I haven't answered your specific question, you might be able to find what you're looking for athttp://www.fairandsimple.gop
Show this thread -
Or if you still have questions about the tax plan, feel free to visit my website http://www.yoder.house.gov where you can contact me with questions.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You are so full of it. The people paying for your campaigns will benefit the most from this tax plan and you know it.
-
There’s even a provision that eliminates write-offs for supplies paid for by the teacher. Every teacher I know pays out of pocket 4 supplies
-
My mom always did, my wife does and all of their coworkers always did and do. Hell, my mom planned family vacations around her curriculum so she would have the most experience possible to teach her students.
-
I’ve been to all the major civil war battle fields...
-
And then some
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Now tell the truth. That tax cut would be for this year. In 2023, the Overland Park public school teacher would see a tax hike of about $250, with no write off for her out-of-pocket supplies. Meanwhile the wealthiest still see a tax cut of $100,000.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Why are you assuming a teacher is a woman, Kev?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Sadly, I think you are right. But what is even sadder is if he thinks that, HE would be right, because the majority of Republicans in Congress ARE rich, white and male.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why are you ignoring all of these people? Twitter is a communication platform that allows people to converse. Try it. Answer these questions. Stop using it as a broadcast platform. No one wants to listen to you blab on and on and on abt this shit. We are CONSTITUENTS!
-
For the same reason he won't have a real town hall
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
THREAD: (1/) These fictitious numbers are based upon the same fraudulent study by .
@taxfoundation, which you referenced earlier this week.https://twitter.com/RepKevinYoder/status/927637215576051716 …
-
(2/) Today it was widely reported that new analysis by former CEA economist Greg Leiserson (
@gregleiserson) had found two glaring flaws in the TF tax model, which heavily skewed the model's forecast.http://equitablegrowth.org/research-analysis/the-tax-foundations-score-of-the-tax-cuts-and-jobs-act/ … -
(3/) First Omission: the Tax Foundation appears to incorrectly model the interaction between federal and state corporate income taxes, thus overstating the effect of statutory rate cuts.
-
(4/) Second Omission: the Tax Foundation appears to treat the estate tax as a nondeductible annual property tax paid by businesses, which results in inflated estimates of the effect of repealing the tax.
-
(5/) Correctly addressing these two issues would reduce the Tax Foundation’s estimate of GDP growth that would result from the legislation, from 3.9% down to 1.9%—a reduction of roughly half.
-
(6/) This is not a full review of their approach, because conducting such an assessment would be challenging given the limited information publicly available about the model.
-
(7/) The significance of these structural flaws raises substantial questions about the reliability of the Tax Foundation’s estimates of economic growth and suggests that policymakers should be skeptical of the results.
-
END/ Late today the Tax Foundation replied to these claims & admitted this assessment of their model was correct & they would be issuing a new & improved forecast shortly.https://twitter.com/taxfoundation/status/928640164477403137 …
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.