My vote this week on the War Powers Resolution was not a go-ahead for the President to engage in a military conflict. My vote was against a resolution more focused on partisan politics than the best interest of our national security.
-
-
I want to see both parties work together to pass an updated Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF). The AUMF defines where and when Armed Forces can be used, but the last time Congress passed an AUMF was in 2002. We must update to account for current security threats.
Diesen Thread anzeigen -
There’s a right and wrong way to keep a check on the Administration and make long-term national security decisions. Partisan politics is the wrong way. Using our constitutional authority to set clear & strategic boundaries about how and when Armed Forces are used is the right way
Diesen Thread anzeigen
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
But was it a credible threat or a political move for trump?!?!!
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
-
-
Who gets to decide what is a threat? The Constitution seems to not trust this power to the president.
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.