"In 2020 governors, secretaries of state, judges, changed election rules—not legislatures."
The crux of the Texas amicus brief is, "What is the meaning of the Constitution’s Electors Clause"?
Great interview from .
newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/w
Conversation
Little Jimmy Banks on January 20th...
GIF
read image description
ALT
1
3
The crux of Texas's amicus brief is "waahhhhhh, we lost."
3
It means that engaged in a seditious act against the United States as he knowingly made a malicious misrepresentation of our Constitution in attempt to overthrow our democracy and violate the civil rights of US citizens.
I demand prosecution for the treacherous act.
1
5
129 Hoosiers died of Covid yesterday, a one day record. Jim Banks is relitigating a court case that SCOTUS dismissed without comment. He does not give a shit if you or your family live or die.
3
If it were truly about this claim, Jim would have previously acted on Indiana's election changes.
Jims actions are not about the constitution or the law. He wants to overturn US democracy.
1
5
I find it odd you signed onto this BIG government brief given the lawsuit attempted to nullify citizens' votes & "claimed that the states’ legislatures, rather than voters, should choose their electors."
Why do you want votes taken away from the American citizens who cast them?
5
Trying to write revisionist history is not gonna work Jim. Your guy lost and your response was to try to disenfranchise people from states you don’t even represent. This is a stain you’ll carry from here on.
4
