How about denouncing this act and didn't see you say anything about the vandalism at the Muslim cemetery in your district a few days ago
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The FBI said it was a bombing. You found a news article that omitted that. Does it hurt your agenda to admit it's white Christian terrorism?
-
If you want to protect the community, maybe you should admit it's in danger. "Explosion" is a decietful way to describe an IED attack.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You had a chance to denounce racism and you didn't. Twice.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's good to hear. Now, hold a Town Meeting to find out how to support your constituents.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you mean yesterday's act of terrorism? Denouncing it would be more appropriate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why don't you denounce this repugnant violence and attack on our community, Jason
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who are these trolls ?
-
Asks the man that reposts Brietbart? The word is constituents
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Jason (or do you prefer CJ?) It was an act of terrorism. A bomb.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Be careful not to overly denounce this act of right-wing terrorism, you don't want to upset your base
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It was a bomb - a terrorist attack -
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seriously?? How about thankfully no one died in the explosion.
-
No one _at the religious building_ died _due to atypical attendance_ in the explosion _caused by a cowardly bombing_. <-fixed that for you
-
Bombings are always cowardly.
-
So why was that statement so conspicuously absent? It's not like Lewis was too quick to have known. It's a lie by omission, nothing less.
-
Best guess is he stuck to the facts cited by the police chief in linked article as investigation is underway.
-
FBI and copious witnesses call it a bomb, both reported within hours, but Lewis quoted that misdescription instead. He did so deliberately.
-
Or are you saying that once that police chief elaborates that it was white terrorists, then Lewis will follow up? I doubt that very much.
- 5 more replies
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.