-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
According to the study funded by your friends the Koch brothers, it costs slightly LESS than it does now for way more coverage. I'll happily pay higher taxes and not have insurance/deductable bills. Plus it's a huge boon for businesses saddled with the cost of employee HC.
-
The “pro business” party sure seems to forget what a burden employer provided healthcare puts on businesses of all sizes when they piss and moan about a Medicare for All plan...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Category: Propaganda. Once again spreading false info to
#MN02, and further dividing constituents. Guess what? A representative to Congress is supposed to represent all in the district, not lie about and demonize half by party. Shame on you, again. -
More BS from
@Jason2CD, just like his claim to be anti-tax, yet be#DoNothingJason when it comes to tariffs and vote to exploded the deficit. More#LyingLewis, just like his owner in the WH.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oh, Jason. The wealthiest country IN HISTORY OF THE WORLD can't find a way to pay for healthcare for everyone? One of the ONLY western nation's to not.
We call bullshit. -
Also, rich coming from a guy on a public paid health plan. Get out.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Thanks for your feedback... But, sorry, you're wrong. Have a nice day.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Midterms a clear referendum on Medicare for All vs. GOP gutting of Medicare to pay for their tax cuts for the rich. Jason--our current system is a burden on the American people. Lack of insurance leads to bankruptcy, poor health outcomes, and lack of economic mobility.
-
Trumps 'junk insurance' plans are not the answer--and for most Americans are not insurance at all. Clear choice: Trump/Lewis/GOP No-Care vs. Medicare for All
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
What's a fiscal burden is when Americans can't afford healthcare premiums and need medical care, it's the taxpayers who bear the costs. What's your solution?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So virtually every developed or semi-developed country in the world can afford universal healthcare, while the mightiest & the wealthiest (as of a couple of years ago anyway) can’t? How exactly do you explain this without insulting our intelligence w/ your “socialism” boogeyman?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Koch Bros supported study found it would save *at least* $2 trillion https://www.mercatus.org/system/files/blahous-costs-medicare-mercatus-working-paper-v1_1.pdf …
#mn02Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also in the news today: the rate of bankruptcies for seniors has tripled. Top reason? Medical bills. The current model is unsustainable. You have yet to offer solutions that would do anything except make the problem worse.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Patient-Centric equates to For-Profit. Reps should protect over Insurance industry. Hospitals, patient organizations like American Pediatrics and AARP are all supporting getting healthcare to the people and not Lewis' plan to take it away.
-
But the NRA does support the plan Lewis supports. Kind of puts it in perspective doesn’t it?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.