-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
32 Trillion is a lot of money......unless you consider the fact that our current system costs 49 Trillion. In context your claims, as always, are phony.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You’re putting the vulnerable at risk by voting with Trump +90%pic.twitter.com/CpMjNbB9xY
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
how much did your tax cut for billionaires add to the debt?pic.twitter.com/r6SVM4Luep
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There you go
@RepJasonLewis. Lying again. The current system would cost $33T over the next 10 years anyway.#MedicareForAll costs less and covers everyone. EVERYONE. It will actually make US companies more competitive since they won’t be in the healthcare business anymore. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
B.S. Where were you last night? Constituents and
@AngieCraigMN were ready to discuss with you. Back and forth hard for you?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tic Toc
@RepJasonLewis@Jason2CD , November 6th is coming soon! -
But not soon enough.
#BlueWave
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you for your leadership, Jason. Minnesota had the best healthcare system before the ACA screwed everything up. Get the insurance & liability atty profit takers out & restore Dr/Patient decision making. Free market systems are 1/10th the cost of ObamaCare. “The Wedge”
@GOP - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Of course you realize it wouldn't add $32T to the debt since we would be replacing the $49T we currently spend. So you think that health care for all means less for others? That's absurd.
#MN02 is going to#TurnCD2Blue#TeamAngieThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I find it interesting how your fiscal hawkishness comes and goes. Increasing the national debt is fine & dandy if it benefits Big Corporate but not if it’s for the good of your constituents.
#MN02 has got you figured out.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would rather pay less in taxes to support Medicare than I do for private insurance that sucks. The market holds no one accountable, but there is a chance for accountability in government. What do you have against accountability and saving money?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Meanwhile $600 epipens ... your big pharma donors must love you! Also, many of us have been all over Europe and Canada and have seen how well healthcare for all can work and can no longer be fooled by your right wing BS.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a specious argument. Clearly, as people paid less for health care, they'd need to pay more in taxes. If such taxes were implemented carefully, everyone would benefit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your analysis isn’t comparative.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And in other GOP harm : Commander Jonathan White of HHS just admitted he warned Trump
@realDonaldTrump & Sessions about "significant risk of harm" & "psychological injury" as consequence of zero tolerance & was ignored: http://pbs.org/newshour/polit …@KPBSMiddaypic.twitter.com/W1PFoHz17u
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even the libertarian think tank study you link below doesn't come to that conclusion. If Medicare is 100% of the market hospitals and doctors will have to take it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.