Republicans are trying to conceal records from 3 of the 5 years Kavanaugh worked in the White House for President Bush. I want to know what exactly is in those papers that they don’t want the American people to see.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
When does Judge Garland get a hearing?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you
@RepJasonLewis for bringing up the Constitution. FYI...there’s a section in there called the#EmolumentsClause that says a sitting president cannot receive any money from a foreign government/person. So why aren’t you “upholding” your pledge to keep@POTUS accountable? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Merrrick Garland agrees with you.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
As long as the POTUS is under investigation this is a big
#No - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Did you tell
@SenateMajLdr that when he sat on Merrick Garland's nomination? I didn't think so. If Kavanaugh is so perfect for the job, why is he dragging his feet on releasing the same documents demanded by the Republicans from Justice Kagan? Hypocrite.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hey good people of
#MN02 Remember, our country can't heal with people who are stuck in the 1960s. Please vote but not for this person. I'm not a troll but a Vet. His type of prejudice and personal attitude is not what we need.#LeadershipfailureThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The House should take up Russian hackers controlling our grid system, especially Representatives with Nuclear Power Plants in their district. Disgusting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Comrade Trump is under investigation and should be barred from nominating anyone. If Trump was a Democrat, you would insist on waiting until after midterms.
#ImpeachTrumpThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We, the people, deserve a thorough review of all Supreme Court Nominees without haste or obfuscation. Many of your constituents are concerned that the President nominated someone who will protect him from appropriate justice for his criminal acts.
#MerrickGarland#MN02 - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Utterly disagree. You should, too, sir. We have a president under legitimate investigation (not to mention factual compromising of his election), as well as a SCOTUS judge who is retiring because of potentially unsavory activity. No appt. should happen.
-
Legitimate. What? Factual. Ha Unsavory. Wtf you talking about. Go home your drunk TOTs.
-
*you’re drunk, not your drunk. In light of current political scene, being drunk does not seem like a bad option.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.