Section 1332 state waivers already protect people with pre-existing conditions. Page 1: “ensure that people with pre-existing conditions are protected.” https://go.cms.gov/2qdKcgJ
Show this thread
DC Secret 
A bill’s title doesn’t have to represent its content
#HR986 DOES NOT change anything pertaining to pre-existing conditions
It's a stunt by Democrats to strip states of power and make Republicans look bad
I DO support coverage for people w/ pre-existing conditions
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
DC Secret: What Republicans say
"D's bill" "Stunt by Democrats" "Make Republicans look bad" VS What Democrats say "The is not a Democratic or Republican issue" "people of all political backgrounds are demanding of us" 
pic.twitter.com/0zPAJFX9hB
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't believe you.
#idontbelieveyouThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You voted to repeal the ACA. Then the phony Trumpcare you voted yes on as a replacement did not protect people. Your votes go against what you are claiming to care about here. It is for that reason I did & will continue to vote for someone else.
-
When I wrote you pleading for you not to vote yes on repeal of ACA, your letter back to me was: ACA is a failure. Well it's not. My son has coverage thanks to Obama. Something you voted to strip away.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
How many times have you voted to repeal the ACA, with no replacement? More than 50.pic.twitter.com/bZBuxtalt9
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.