(1/6) On the day of my swearing in as a member of the 116th Congress, Democrats in my class were calling for impeachment—on the day we swore in, long before @RealDonaldTrump made a phone call to the newly elected President of Ukraine.
-
-
(4/6) SECOND: Obstruction of Justice But after searching diligently and trying to find any evidence that the President obstructed justice, Democrats abandoned that theory. NO OBSTRUCTION.
Deze collectie tonen -
(5/6) THIRD: Corruption For weeks Democrats and the mainstream media turned their talking points to corruption. That fizzled. NO CORRUPTION.
Deze collectie tonen -
(6/6) NOW: Out of the blue, after coordinating with Democrat staff in the Intelligence committee, a “whistleblower” filed a carefully scripted complaint based solely and completely on hearsay.
Deze collectie tonen
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
How many MILLIONS of dollars has the Donald charged Americans for his golf excursions?
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
You mean the investigation of a Republican president, headed by a Republican special counsel, from an agency with a Republican director, that was funded by a Republican Congress? That one?
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
You didn’t read the Mueller Report. Did you. Stonewalling an investigation (just to clarify here, stonewalling is not turning over documents, destroying documents & not testifying fully or honestly) does not equal exoneration. Stop misleading the American public. It’s sad.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.
