It's not "civil immunity." It's called freedom.
You should not have civil immunity to remove lawful political speech. Instead, give users the option to filter the lawful content they may not like. Let users choose. #StoptheCensorshipActhttps://twitter.com/YouTubeInsider/status/1177019863597899782 …
-
-
-
Constituent here, btw.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This is called "compelled speech." And it's a direct slap in the face of free speech to advocate for it.
-
How is it compelled speech? Aren't we only talking about what YouTube allows third parties to say on their site?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
-
Exactly, Rep Gosar ... WE, can filter ourselves!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is the results of a search for ‘boobs’ on
@YouTube, standards? https://m.youtube.com/results?search_query=Boobs …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.