I just introduced #StoptheCensorshipAct to combat Big Tech’s censorship of political speech.
Learn more 
Show this thread
-
Big Tech has been given blanket immunity by section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. They claim a ‘platform’s discretion for removing content but claim ‘publishers’ aren’t liable when they monetize their users’ content.
#StoptheCensorshipActShow this thread
Despite their claims, Big Tech does not always foreclose on violent/obscene behavior; in fact, they often monetize it-but they do police political speech. Big Tech’s immunity should strictly be for good faith efforts to remove actual unlawful material. #StoptheCensorshipAct
-
-
#StoptheCensorshipAct facilitates the option for a self-imposed safe space, or unfettered free speech, whichever the user chooses. Currently, the only content moderation options are versions of whatever material Big Tech wants you to see.Show this thread -
#StoptheCensorshipAct ensures that there is no use of presumed ‘public’ desire not to be exposed to ‘objectionable’ material to justify the suppression of supposedly ‘objectionable’ political speech.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They can only remove contents by court orders, period. Otherwise they shall liable to anything on their platform.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.