NEVER HAS THERE BEEN SUCH A UNINFORMED STATEMENT
“If the Green New Deal were serious about reducing carbon dioxide emissions, it would consider nuclear energy.” — Katie Tubb, Policy Analyst for energy and environmental issues, Heritage Foundation #GreenPipeDreampic.twitter.com/iN3adeLvrC
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"If Congress were serious about nuclear energy, it would solve the issue of storage for spent fuel, which it has steadfastly failed to do." - Michael Harris, disgruntled constituent for Arizona's 4th Congressional District.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They are also serious about reducing radioactive waste from nuclear energy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh, well if the Heritage Foundation said it, it must be true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Representative Gosar, are you willing to take no mone from fossil fuel companies to support your campaign?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Like Three Mile Island ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not sure what you mean, nuclear produces steam and water that takes 2000 years to become safe
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just put a stop to the weather warfare and disaster capitalism that's going on all over the world, hold corporations accountable for the waste they discharge into the air land and sea. *THAT* is the "Green" New Deal we need-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.