But not in relation to what we’re giving away to our attackers, right, Paul?https://twitter.com/AshMcGonigal/status/1019988420490391552 …
More transparency in relation to costs is always a good thing. I’m pleased to see H.R. 5556 pass @NatResources Committee with strong bipartisan support. http://bit.ly/2NoXVuM pic.twitter.com/kEqHlgky7F
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm so glad you are focused on transparency. I assume you are as concerned as the rest of us about the lack of transparency shown by the president in his 1-1 Helsinki meeting w/Putin. I look forward to your call to subpoena the State Dept translator.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Like transparency for political donors? I hear you are against that one. So transparency for organizations you don't support is good but when it's the people who give you money a total lack of transparecy is ok! One this is Transparent; your motives!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are you kidding? What will it cost if we don't protect our environment? I know you have kids? Maybe grand kids? You don't care if they live on a dying earth? What the hell is wrong with you? You seem brainwashed. You ALWAYS vote the wrong way.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank you for all you are doing to protect the rights established under the Constitution Free speech, freedom of the press to report the truth due process
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.