I don't see renewables like wind, and solar? Why?
-
-
-
Expensive and unreliable. Sure it should be in the plan but not THE plan. Nuclear is what we need
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Removing sanctions from 3 Russian companies, like Trump did, is much worse.
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I know right plus you don’t have to live in those areas and drink the water so it’s a total win win
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
According to Pehl et al. CCS systems applied to fossil fuel plants have a life cycle emissions (mining to decomissioning) of 78g to 110g CO2 eq. per kWh in a fully decarbonized system, compared to 3.5g to 12g CO2 eq. per kWh for Renewables and Nuclear.https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-017-0032-9 …
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
I am amazed people continue to push solar and wind systems that require massive unaffordable energy storage and fossil fuel peak-power generators. Invest in nuclear. Warren isn’t worth a response or a vote.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
All well and good to criticize, but as the leading party going into the election what is your plan to deal with climate change?
-
Carbon capture, LNG, nuclear, and planting 1 trillion trees.
- 3 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Maybe propose a bill to lift the insane regulations on Nuclear Power so we can build new plants at a reasonable cost instead of continuing to operate 30+ year old plants we cannot upgrade.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.