one has to ask why witnesses and documents are being held back by this administration? this is the real question.
This stuck out to me as well. If Sondland is their best “evidence,” how do they explain his very clear statement that he himself had no evidence of a connection between aid and investigations?https://twitter.com/MarkMeadows/status/1220732514890846209 …
2:06
-
-
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
No that begs the question now, doesn’t it? Today was a mere intro. This impeachment will die on the vine this upcoming week. Then legislative abuse of power MUST be addressed. The system is working. Our founders never said it would be pretty. Federalist #10 rings in my ears!
-
Well said.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Why not hear from the witnesses and read the Transcripts blocked by the white house that maybe make clear out you mind?
@RepDanCrenshaw -
Because if those were so important, they should’ve fought for them in the house, not tried to make the senate do the houses job. The house gave the senate a half assed investigation and wants the senate to now of the work they should’ve done.
- 14 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
No one prevents a witness who can exonerate them from testifying!pic.twitter.com/YoZdEf6nd7
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
- 3 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Ah, the ol’ “he didn’t tell me he was robbing anyone as he had his gun pointed at their heads” defense. It’s an oldie but goodie
-
And let’s not forget the classic “he dropped the gun when the police arrived, so it couldn’t have been a robbery!”
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.