It will make for a bigger tax burden on everyone, but on the other hand it will free up the premiums people pay today for their healthcare. So in reality, at the end of the day for most people it might come out pretty much the same? It is also much more fair to everyone.
-
-
-
Yeah no....prosperity goes down the toilet.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Now do the cost of tariffs.
-
No where near $52 TRILLION.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Who can't follow this? A tax on employers is passed on to workers and consumers. A payroll tax is specific to workers.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Oh right! I forgot every employer in the socislist mindset is a millionaire/billionaire not hard working middle class people helping to provide jobs. Many businesses fail because of outrageous taxation as it is now. This is sure to help it happen faster.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Once again all Republicans can do is criticize the other side while never offering any solutions if their own (except be really really wealthy). It’s beyond tiresome.
@ElisaCardnellMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Of course. The only question is whether it’ll ultimately reduce net costs. For
@ewarren to not be transparent about this was (and is) a grave mistake. No one wants to be sold a Mercedes and given a Camry. Be honest. Be transparent. There is an economic debate to be had... -
Medicare itself is cheaper
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Meanwhile my Rep sits back and questions nothing!!https://twitter.com/whstancil/status/1201857072595382272?s=21 …
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.