Vous pouvez ajouter des informations de localisation à vos Tweets, comme votre ville ou votre localisation précise, depuis le Web et via des applications tierces. Vous avez toujours la possibilité de supprimer l'historique de localisation de vos Tweets. En savoir plus
The issues being raised are twofold: is it legal for President Trump to ask about allegations regarding a political opponent, and is it appropriate?
To answer the first part: it is legal for the United States to work with foreign governments on investigations, especially an investigation involving American influence.
Whether it is appropriate for the President to discuss that on this particular call is simply a political question. But it is a question of style, not legality.
There was no investigation involving US influence. The Ukraines already debunked and refuted that before the call.
Party before country. How much did your soul cost?
Trump just trumped DEMs!
A Treaty signed by exactly what official role and what official clearance did Rudy Guiliani have to work on behalf of the security of the United States on this issue? ...by blackmailing another government mind you....but we'll get to that.
There’s a difference between collaborating with a country and forcing them to work with us with the threat of pulling aid, Dan.
I remember you being smarter than this, Dan. The specific situation requires specific analysis. In this instance, the investigation represented practical value to the person requesting it.
I see how you changed the frame of point one. You don’t think people are smart enough to catch that. I do. I think many many people see how working “together” versus being coerced is different. 1 of 2
Dan. It really pains me to see someone in such hard denial of the facts and reality. Trump broke the law.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
