Yes! Thank you for including nuclear. I worked in the industry for years, and know well its potential. It's refreshing to hear a politician acknowledge it as well.
-
-
-
Shame nuclear is denounced due to the old stigma assigned to it. Modern nuclear like 4th generation fast track generators (correct me if I'm wrong on terminology) could solve so much and are safer than mass burning of fossil fuels.
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
You are my favorite person to follow on Twitter.
-
I’ve never given $1 to a political campaign in the past.
@RepDanCrenshaw makes me want to support him in any way possible from Iowa.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Brilliant... those that don’t embrace solutions like these have an underlying motive that is not related to solving so-called “Climate Change”. They are more interested in control and fundamentally transforming our nation into a socialist state.
-
Solutions that don't acknowledge the problem or solve it are by definition not solutions.
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
When you become a scientist, then lecture me about what's going to happen in 12 years
-
They can't even tell you with accuracy if it will rain next Thursday, but sure..
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
The phrase 'climate change," is a money maker. Consultants, and businesses make money on it. Talk about the real problem, pollution. I will not admit to climate change but I will talk about pollution anytime, anywhere.
-
Has climate, throughout all of history, ever been static? Climate has ALWAYS been changing!!! And guess what...humanity will adapt (evolve) or die. Hubris to think we are entitled to “guaranteed” climate conditions lest we are inconvenienced or challenged to survive.
- 2 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.