This evening, my colleagues and I filed a lawsuit to ensure the House remains the People’s House, not a body dictated by the whims of a few dozen members.
@HouseDemocrats recently voted for a rule, on close to a party line vote, that upends 231-years ...https://www.wsj.com/articles/house-republicans-move-to-block-proxy-voting-11590525018?mod=mhp …
-
-
America is flexible. We certainly can adapt and use technology where appropriate to streamline hearings, committee work, and share information. The Constitution rightfully contemplates a quorum be present, and that no member of Congress passes off his or her obligation to vote...
Afficher cette discussion -
to another. It would be preferred for the House of Representatives to police its own adherence to the Constitution, rather than go to the Article III Courts.
Afficher cette discussion -
But, the rules of the House limit virtually all action and debate to the majority – in this case, led by Speaker Pelosi. Because the damage to the institution would be so significant and immediate, it demands we resolve this question quickly to protect the Constitution and true..
Afficher cette discussion -
representation in our great Republic. I am particularly pleased that the effort to challenge this constitutional rule is being represented by my friend and one of the finest legal minds in the nation, Chuck Cooper.
Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.