Vous pouvez ajouter des informations de localisation à vos Tweets, comme votre ville ou votre localisation précise, depuis le Web et via des applications tierces. Vous avez toujours la possibilité de supprimer l'historique de localisation de vos Tweets. En savoir plus
If you are predisposed to believe the president engaged in conduct deserving of scrutiny, blame the House Democrats for failing to do their job, not the Senate.
@SpeakerPelosi rushed the case through to a partisan vote (losing Democrats, gaining no Republicans).
They refused to make proper subpoenas in the first place. They pulled their subpoena of Kupperman rather than press their case regarding the dispute over executive privilege. They could have pressed a subpoena for anyone they wanted. They didn't. They had complete control.
And more ... House Democrats sat on the Articles of Impeachment for 33 days to try to extract demands from the Senate because they knew the case they made was so weak it couldn't stand by itself.
@RepJerryNadler is claiming the "Senate is on trial in the eyes of the American people." In reality, his party failed to make its case and now wants the Senate to do it for them. That’s not how this works. In my view, once the cases are presented, they should be dismissed.
I hope our children and grandchildren see this bumbled process, which is supposed to be one of our most solemn duties under the Constitution, and choose not to make the same mistakes.
Legal House subpoenas? Only if voted on by the House prior to issuing? If subpoenas went to Court, it would reveal as improperly issued subpoenas (bad for persuading impeachment). Asking Senate to now issue legalizes invalid subpoenas avoiding Court, House & Constitution issues.
Do you want the truth or are you only interested in scoring debate points? TX-21 Constituent
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
