Missed amid the partisan fervor following the death of terrorist leader Qassem Suleimani was the unique opportunity it presented Congress to come to a national consensus about the U.S. presence in the Middle East.
Afficher cette discussion
After 18 years at war without so much as a debate in Congress about the extent to which our men and women in uniform are deployed overseas, @realDonaldTrump's decision to take out the Iranian general last week catalyzed a national conversation between Republicans and Democrats.
-
-
But the question many of my colleagues raised over the past week did not materialize into action. Instead of having the debate many of us in Congress are eager to see, we were presented a resolution Thursday that focused on the president’s decision to take out a terrorist leader.
Afficher cette discussion -
What would be more productive? Read my op-ed in
@FDRLST:https://thefederalist.com/2020/01/13/in-wake-of-iran-strike-congress-needs-to-debate-overseas-deployments/ …Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I would like to agree with you however what always comes to mind is the entire legislative branch full of pandering political prostitutes on both sides of the aisle that been entrenched parasites upon the American people for decades. There has been no reason to try to debate
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.