Why is GOP allowing a human trafficking loophole. Y'all are horrible. Section 224 (a) says that ICE may not remove any sponsor or *potential sponsor* or *member of a household* of a UAC. That's de facto sanctuary for anyone near a UAC. Ridiculous. 30-40% of MS-13 are UACs.
-
-
-
Section 224 alone is reason enough to oppose this bill. It will encourage bad actors like MS-13 members to recruit and sponsor UAC. Terrible provision that will endanger children.
- 1 réponse de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
My son’s life mattered!! He would have been 6 this year if not for that illegal alien!!!pic.twitter.com/THPZxGWzh6
-
Can I share this? I’m very passionate about border wall and helping angel moms! Inbox me if yes.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
-
Speaker Pelosi: "You want to talk about a national emergency? Let's talk about today, the one-year anniversary [of Parkland] ... Why don't you declare that emergency, Mr. President? I wish you would."pic.twitter.com/JcCzOjsgw9
- 4 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Proud of you ! Glad you are there representing my congressional district.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
What are you talking about, "crisis on the border?" Apprehensions at the border are DOWN. Declining steadily over the past 17 years. Mexico was never going t pay for Trump's vanity wall and we taxpayers aren't going to either.pic.twitter.com/LpdA0Y46pO
-
No crisis. No national emergency.
#NoWall
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Thank you for standing up for the citizens of this country.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.