We’ve learned two things this week: career bureaucrats don’t like President Trump and Democrats don’t have a case against him. This week’s hearsay and speculation would get tossed out in court, but not in the Democrats’ kangaroo impeachment court.
-
-
Amb. Sondland testified that Trump told him he wasn’t holding funds up for a quid pro quo. He said he told a Ukrainian that issuing Giuliani’s statement on corruption would help, but he clearly admitted this was based upon a ‘presumption,’ not any direction from
@realDonaldTrump.Show this thread -
Amb. Taylor, who claims he had a clear understanding of a quid pro quo, admitted this was all 2nd or 3rd hand—no direct knowledge—some of it even from the New York Times! He never had a conversation w
@realDonaldTrump , Giuliani or Mulvaney. Read more here.https://yellowhammernews.com/exclusive-byrne-details-why-testimony-proves-democrats-impeachment-case-would-get-tossed-out-in-court/ …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A Quid Pro Quo by any other name still smells like one, acts like one, feels like one, and should be legally punished as one. This current day GOP is starting to sound like the Animal Farm
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.