.@RepBrianFitz BS it wasn't critical 6 months ago or 8 months ago or a year ago when President Obama's choice was on the table #GOPokiedoke
-
-
-
Hey, Brian, do you really think your constituents have short memories?
#JusticeGarland
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, indeed -- appointing Merrick Garland would help to ensure faith in our governing institutions.
-
There are a couple of things that Republicans could do right now, in my view, that would heal the legitimacy of the Court.
-
1) Hold hearings and a vote on Merrick Garland. Not even saying he has to pass - even just give a valid reason for voting him down.
-
2) Pass a law that NO president can appoint a justice in an election year. Turn their fake rule into a real one, so it applies to Trump.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
the vacancy SAT for a YEAR bc of the Senate GOP. There was a nomination. He wasn't even given a HEARING. This is bs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would like an explanation as to why you sold out our internet privacy for $32,600?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the hypocrisy of this position is breathtaking.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
while our President is under investigation it's not. Congress should work to get that resolved first.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It was critically important for the Senate to act on Merrick Garland and yet GOP was derelict in duty. Expect no less from DEMs.
#SCOTUSThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh really? - If it is so critically important why did the GOP block Merrick Garland? Just important for right wing agenda
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
you mean like with Garland? Now you are spewing partisan nonsense
-
Garland was a pro big govt, anti 2 amend, partisan activist
-
don't start with your 2nd amendment BS. We are talking about Congressional obstruction
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Merrick Garland
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Then they should have given Merrick Garland a hearing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Was this your opinion when Repubs refused to even look at Merrick Garland? POTUS under FBI investigation shouldn't get pick!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.