.@MattPMiller @violiav @jody_saylor U.S. Representatives do not draw districts--states do this. There is no proof that TX-17 is improper.
-
-
Replying to @RepBillFlores
that is a demonstrably false statement Congressman. I expect better from you. http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2013/jul/17/elliott-naishtat/austin-legislator-calls-austin-largest-us-city-wit/ …
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MattPMiller
.
@MattPMiller Two key points--(1) the map was also "court imposed" & (2) the Constitution says nothing about "anchor districts ".3 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @RepBillFlores
you can claim to represent everyone, but the facts show it is not true
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @MattPMiller
.
@MattPMiller Good grief, the one in the article that YOU posted on my Twitter page.4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @RepBillFlores
that lawsuit was about race and not the 17 CD. This is about a partisan gerrymander to dilute opposing voices
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MattPMiller
.
@MattPMiller The Constitution has no reference to "opposing voices".1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @RepBillFlores
I'm sorry Congressman. The Courts and I disagree with youhttps://www.google.com/amp/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN13H0SV?client=safari …
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
.@MattPMiller You keep posting information irrelevant to TX-17.
-
-
Replying to @RepBillFlores @MattPMiller
hm. Tx districts were gerrymandered. http://www.chron.com/news/politics/texas/article/This-is-how-badly-Republicans-have-gerrymandered-6246509.php …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.