You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
We should not fund President Trump’s request for new low-yield nuclear weapons. His proposal dangerously lowers the threshold to nuclear use and siphons money away from genuine military readiness needs.https://twitter.com/HASCDemocrats/status/1042099483297959936 …
We already have a nuclear deterrent that is more than adequate to achieve our national security goals. Funding new, low-yield weapons would only draw us further into an unnecessary nuclear arms race and increase the risks of miscalculation.
A strong military is good for America, but use of a small nuke will be as diplomatically devastating as a large one. This money would serve US better for cyber/voting security. Thank you Congressman
... and siphons money away from genuine environmental & societal needs.
There, I fixed it for you 
You are so full of it. Nuclear codes are safe with Trump. Will not be safe with democrats.
How do you figure? Democrats don't like war in general, and we've always fought against nuclear proliferation.
TY. Your non- partisan work on the committee is appreciated. Btw, you have foreign bots on you TL trying to divide us!
I agree but serious question.... is this not simply a continuation of Obama's nuclear modernization program #2647 ?
So why were new nukes approved as part of the #FY19NDAA ?? I know Lieu voted for it as did my rep, Schiff. How about you Adam?
First it's improved, and now legislation is introduced to block it??
What am I missing...?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
