There’s a difference between censorship and removing someone from a private platform for hate speech
I apologise. I was running on 2 hours’ sleep when I replied but now I’m fully awake I see the context I missed. Either way, though laws rightfully state that hate speech is illegal, the proverbial goalposts as to what constitutes as ‘illegal’ have too much freedom to move. —
-
-
— In the Dankula case, for example, not only did the police arrest him when no complaints were made against the video, the judges of the high court declared that ‘context was irrelevant’ and that his actions were ‘grossly offensive’ despite said context proving that —
-
— It was the other way around. As such, hate speech IS subjective. Out of all the social media sites that shut him down, only ONE got rid of him on grounds of hate speech, which means it isn’t a universal reason.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
