Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @RemcoHeesen

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @RemcoHeesen

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. sij

    How are citation metrics and other ways of evaluating science affecting scientific advances? raises some interesting questions when he talks with .

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    . & discuss whether peer review is a good thing, and what effect this would have on the social structure of science.

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I submitted a paper that shows open peer review is correlated with more positive reviews to a journal that requires open peer review and anyone and to anyone who does not appreciate the irony I say your loss :)

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. pro 2019.
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Quite to 's and I's surprise, some very witty people made the rather drôle observation that, when you think about it, there is actually some irony to us putting our paper against peer review in a peer reviewed journal! Oh we were much taken aback, oh such ribaldry!

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    19. pro 2019.

    "What the bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers. " ()

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    6. pro 2019.

    🗣 POISSON(7.67)!

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. lis 2019.
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. lis 2019.

    🗣 BETA(4.17,1.48)!

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Epistemic Diversity and Editor Decisions: A Statistical Matthew Effect Remco Heesen () and Jan-Willem Romeijn SEPTEMBER 2019, VOL. 19, NO. 39, PP. 1-20

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    In his paper 'When Journal Editors Play Favorites' (Philosopher's Annual Selection 2018), advises that journals from all fields use triple-anonymous procedures to avoid the epistemic injustice of connection and identity bias:

    Poništi
  11. 14. ruj 2019.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    12. ruj 2019.

    Check out Cailin talking about her exceptional student, Aydin! I know Aydin's work well, and I agree with everything she says.

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    11. ruj 2019.

    Congrats to all the chosen authors in this year's Philosopher's Annual. Especially to my former student . His article is very interesting for philosophers and metascience folks. I encourage you to check it out.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    10. ruj 2019.

    Six new papers up at , including papers by and . I'll post these to the Imprint Twitter and Facebook feed soon.

    Poništi
  15. 24. kol 2019.

    Papers promoting post-publication peer review: (with ), (with and ), (with Jan-Willem Romeijn; also a follow-up to the Philosopher's Annual paper).

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 24. kol 2019.

    Happy to share that my paper "When Journal Editors Play Favorites" will be in the 2018 edition of the Philosopher's Annual. Especially nice as it's a form of post-publication peer review which I've argued in print we need more of! (see first comment)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. kol 2019.

    Why we shouldn’t take peer review as the ‘gold standard’ - The Washington Post

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. srp 2019.

    The future of scientific publishing is servers for publication and open access to papers plus post-publication open peer review. is exploring steps in this direction, motivated by all the good arguments in this thread...

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Since there's been a lot of discussion today about prompted by , I thought it would be a good time to discuss several initiatives we're taking to reshape peer review.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. srp 2019.
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·