Plus by now... that 3% has been diluted way, way down.
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I expexr climate change to exist. But they didn't look at all 3% of the studies. Just 38 of them.pic.twitter.com/1P5ERh4ssK
-
"38 papers selected.. not.. being a representative statistical sample reflecting the volume of scientific literature.. the purpose was not to draw general conclusions about the entire body of scientific literature but to learn from mistakes."
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
It is not surprising. 3% should be lower than the error rate in many fields in bio science.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I don't doubt climate change (warming) however, does this graph indicate we're more likely to have a significant cooling spell?pic.twitter.com/ILmZLBOODd
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.