Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @ReginaldOhLaw
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @ReginaldOhLaw
-
Prikvačeni tweet
Trump’s withholding of military aid to Ukraine, by itself, was illegal and an abuse of power. In fact, that act is very similar to what Nixon often did during his presidency, something that nearly got Nixon impeached, Thread
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Reginald Oh proslijedio/la je Tweet
"The GOP Senate’s sham impeachment trial without witnesses, in conjunction with their vote to acquit, will go down in history as one of the worst decisions ever rendered by the Senate." Read the full LO statement on the partisan acquittal of Trump below.https://www.theloyalopposition.net/daily-ctas/the-loyal-opposition-statement-on-the-impeachment-acquittal-of-donald-trump/ …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Reginald Oh proslijedio/la je Tweet
Call To Action: Nationwide Reject the Cover Up Rallies Wed., Feb. 5 at 5:30 pm local time We’re taking to the streets to hold our senators accountable for covering up for this lawless president. Click on the link below for an event near you.http://rejectthecoverup.org
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Reginald Oh proslijedio/la je Tweet
Primary season has only just begun. The
#IowaCaucus may be over, but the rest of the country still needs to weigh in. Still undecided about who to vote for in the primary? Use this quiz to help you evaluate the candidates:https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/policy-2020/quiz-which-candidate-agrees-with-me/ …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Reginald Oh proslijedio/la je Tweet
GOP senator excuse Trump's wrongdoing as merely "inappropriate." Not shaking Pelosi's hand at the SOTU was inappropriate. Threatening to cancel 400 mill in aid unless Ukraine announced a sham investigation of a political rival is a HIGH CRIME.https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/481492-gop-senators-label-trumps-behavior-shameful-but-not-impeachable …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Reginald Oh proslijedio/la je Tweet
As the Senate prepares to undermine the constitution - everyone should know: Trump’s defense is literally a confession to his abuse of power. He is guilty. Forever. From
@ReginaldOhLaw - on the law that Trump broke by withholding aid:#DemCasthttps://demcastusa.com/2020/02/05/trumps-corruption-defense-is-his-confession/ …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
If you think Trump's motives were mixed, that's an argument for more witnesses, especially those who could help discern Trump's state of mind. FYI, Trump's motives were not mixed. His only motive was corrupt-to solicit a bribe from Ukraine.https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1224819797524930562 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Reginald Oh proslijedio/la je Tweet
Avoid making unfounded statements claiming that the elections are or will be "rigged." It is disinformation aimed at depressing voter turnout. It's a form of voter suppression. It only promotes cynicism and disillusionment. It is anti-democracy. https://twitter.com/jamalgreene/status/1223982266554167296?s=20 …https://twitter.com/jamalgreene/status/1223982266554167296 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Reginald Oh proslijedio/la je Tweet
White supremacy is not a thing of the past. It's here. Now. And it's hiding in voter ID laws. "...voter suppression today is still preventing people considered marginalized — blacks, Latinos & others of color — from exercising the right to vote."https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/this-black-history-month-lets-focus-on-the-present/2020/01/31/513c617c-43a6-11ea-b5fc-eefa848cde99_story.html …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Reginald Oh proslijedio/la je Tweet
The Senate's acquittal will be a travesty of justice, especially given that Trump has all but confessed to serious wrongdoing, writes Law Professor
@ReginaldOhLaw. His defense, that he withheld aid temporarily b/c of corruption, is his open confession.https://www.theloyalopposition.net/daily-ctas/trumps-corruption-defense-is-his-confession/ …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I hope this thread has given you food for reasoned, principled thought. Please do the right thing on Wednesday. This nation and the rule of law is counting on all of you. END
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
In other words, imagine any other president other than Trump engaging in the same misconduct, and what you think the likely outcome would and should be. It’s absolutely clear-anyone other than Trump probably would’ve resigned before the Senate trial even began.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
And finally, the fifth reason why you should vote to convict-because if it was President Obama being tried for these allegations based on the same evidence, all the GOP senators defending Trump would’ve been leading the charge to convict.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
When we understand that the "corruption" rationale cannot justify his actions, then, what's left? What other justification does he have for a temporary hold? None. All we're left with his is corrupt intent to solicit a bribe from Ukraine.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
A policy reason. Huh? Arguing that he had a policy reason for temporarily withholding aid is like arguing that he had a legitimate reason to shoot a guy on 5th Avenue because he hated the guy. That’s not a legitimate reason, that’s a confession.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
For a policy reason, the only recourse is to send Congress a special message explaining that he wants to rescind or cancel the aid. He needed to have a budgetary reason, not a policy reason, to justify a temporary hold. So, what reason did he come up with for a temporary hold?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The Impoundment Control Act explicitly denies the president the legal authority to temporarily withhold aid for a *policy* reason. He can only put a temporary hold for a pure budgetary reason.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Why? If a president wants to hold up aid because of a POLICY reason (a concern about corruption), the law required him to seek to *permanently* cancel the aid, not to put a temporary hold on it.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Because his central defense, that he withheld aid out of concern with Ukraine corruption, actually is a confession, not a legitimate reason. It's a confession that he had no lawful reason for putting the aid on temporary hold or pause.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Fourth, the evidence of corrupt intent is extremely strong. Moreover, there is no credible argument to suggest that Trump had even a mixed motive for withholding aid. His sole motive was to coerce Ukraine to announce an investigation of Biden. That’s it. How do we know this?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
In other words, the jury may assume that the witness would have provided damaging testimony to the party. The same principle should apply in this context. We should infer that any witnesses and documents introduced at trial would’ve produced damaging evidence against Trump.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.