Some need labels and categories to separate people in order to harass or debase them. The only time CIS is used when referring to me is in that way.
Do we need these labels in order to communicate? No. So those that use them when describing others are doing it for neg reasons. https://twitter.com/JohnHennings3/status/1290319269453074441 …
-
-
"cis-Atlantic"


I cant stop laughing. -
It’s a perfectly good word. First recorded usage was in 1785.https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cisatlantic …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Someone once did try to convince me “cis-Atlantic” was a thing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Latin teacher here. This

- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
That’s literally opposite. Trans people will say that they didn’t cross or change, they have always been the gender they are; but their society put them on “the other side” for reasons. So your argument, such as it is, fails in the premises before ever getting to a conclusion
-
Then they can call themselves and conceive of their transition however best suits them. I won't use cis because it's unnecessary cod latin that assumes I buy into gender ideology, which I don't.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
The opposite of transformed is preserved.
-
Indeed, and if people started saying 'cisformed' instead, then it would become a word, regardless of how 'cod Latin' that might or might not be.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.