you realize that, in a place as dense as a city, there is almost always a non-highway option to get somewhere, right?
-
when highways INTERSECT cities, i said. as in go through. you can't fit multiple highways through a city
dude, if you need to get somewhere in a city, you can take the city streets w/out getting on the highway. wtf?
-
-
THE HIGHWAYS STILL NEED TO GO THROUGH THE CITY or at least in some way intersect, otherwise, what is the point of a highway
-
if you're talking about highways between cities, there is generally more space available for competing highway. So?
-
AT SOME POINT THE HIGHWAYS NEED TO INTERSECT WITH CITIES. third or fourth time i said that i think
-
wat? Dude, couldn't a cheap-ass "budget" highway take u to outskirts of another city, & let u use city streets to drive to center?
-
your argument is paper thin and based on ridiculous assumptions
-
u assume free-market solutions have to be as rigid & unimaginative as statist ones. Maybe a helicopter ride would be better for upic.twitter.com/2AysTDxXei
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
i'm not talking about inner city travel
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.