perhaps if a single entity owned all roads. However, even necessary water utilities somehow avoid being prohibitively expensive.
-
it would be extremely impractical...and considering highways intersect with cities, etc. impossible in most cases
you realize that, in a place as dense as a city, there is almost always a non-highway option to get somewhere, right?
-
-
1)you changed the argument 2)you would eventually need to use the highway unless you never leave the city
-
1. No, city streets compete w/ highways within a city 2. Likely, however, then you'd have more space for competing highways
-
...i don't know of any places where there is ample room for highways to run parallel.
-
have you never driven between states before? Look left, look right, trees and grass for miles.
-
not where i live...and there is still the case of when the highway intersects cities, etc.
-
"and there is still the case of when the highway intersects cities" LOL, you mean the topic we just addressed?
-
uh, yes, the issue i mentioned and you offered no solution for
-
here is my answer a second time:https://twitter.com/Red_Panels/status/786387450402775040 …
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
3)people who live in the suburbs/urban areas typically need to use the highway to commute.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.