![[Aléd H.]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1146844102127783936/pB4B6UoF_normal.jpg)
why privatize roads? there is no incentive for private owners to maintain b/c people have to use them regardless
.@amazingatheist: unironically slamming private interstate infrastructure using private interstate infrastructure
https://twitter.com/amazingatheist/status/786028169845313537?s=09 …pic.twitter.com/wHZJfwlUuG
-
-
-
people also have to use electrical utilities. When's the last time you had to deal w/ a blackout/brownout?
-
...privatization be any better?
-
1. coercion of taxation removed 2. benefits ultimately unforseeable, who could've predicted YouTube as consequence of private web?
-
internet isn't the same, people don't have to use youtube, websites have to maintain a standard of quality to maintain users
-
also, taxes wouldn't necessarily be lowered, those funds would probably be re-purposed, knowing our govt
-
perhaps you ought not to compel others to pay for a service simply because you cannot imagine alternatives.
-
historically this has not been the case.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The Internet was privatized so cheaply because you could easily put adds everywhere. Now do that with roads.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.